<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 86 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362778</link>
    <description>Valuation-based duty demand was held unsustainable where job-worked components were transferred on stock transfer to the assessee&#039;s own sister unit, because any additional duty paid would have been available as credit to the recipient unit. The transaction was therefore revenue neutral, leaving no net gain to the Revenue or corresponding loss to the assessee. On that basis, the higher assessable value adopted for the clearances could not support the demand, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:23:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 86 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362778</link>
      <description>Valuation-based duty demand was held unsustainable where job-worked components were transferred on stock transfer to the assessee&#039;s own sister unit, because any additional duty paid would have been available as credit to the recipient unit. The transaction was therefore revenue neutral, leaving no net gain to the Revenue or corresponding loss to the assessee. On that basis, the higher assessable value adopted for the clearances could not support the demand, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>