https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362776 The Tribunal allowed the applications seeking rectification of a mistake in Final Order No. 42811-42821/2017. The error pertained to the incorrect mention of values of goods seized at DXN Puducherry in para-19, which actually related to para-8 of the adjudication order. After acknowledging the mistake, the Tribunal ordered the modification of the Final Order to accurately reflect the values of goods mentioned in specific paras of the adjudication order, thereby rectifying the error apparent on the face of the record. en-us Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:23:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362776 The Tribunal allowed the applications seeking rectification of a mistake in Final Order No. 42811-42821/2017. The error pertained to the incorrect mention of values of goods seized at DXN Puducherry in para-19, which actually related to para-8 of the adjudication order. After acknowledging the mistake, the Tribunal ordered the modification of the Final Order to accurately reflect the values of goods mentioned in specific paras of the adjudication order, thereby rectifying the error apparent on the face of the record. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362776