https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362775 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief. The decision emphasized the importance of disclosing all relevant details and promptly addressing duty liabilities. It clarified that when penalties on the supplier are overturned due to lack of intent to evade duty payment, the admissibility of credit for the appellant should also be upheld. The judgment highlighted the need for adherence to legal provisions and proper documentation to avoid disputes regarding CENVAT credit eligibility. en-us Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Mar 2020 14:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362775 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief. The decision emphasized the importance of disclosing all relevant details and promptly addressing duty liabilities. It clarified that when penalties on the supplier are overturned due to lack of intent to evade duty payment, the admissibility of credit for the appellant should also be upheld. The judgment highlighted the need for adherence to legal provisions and proper documentation to avoid disputes regarding CENVAT credit eligibility. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362775