<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1359 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273587</link>
    <description>The Member(Judicial) held that interest on differential duty paid before finalization of assessment is not chargeable under Rule 7(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Citing previous Tribunal decisions and Bombay High Court judgments, the Member(Judicial) concluded that interest is not applicable in such cases, overturning the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 06:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1359 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273587</link>
      <description>The Member(Judicial) held that interest on differential duty paid before finalization of assessment is not chargeable under Rule 7(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Citing previous Tribunal decisions and Bombay High Court judgments, the Member(Judicial) concluded that interest is not applicable in such cases, overturning the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>