<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 490 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273584</link>
    <description>The court held that stamp duty is chargeable based on the market value of the property conveyed by the instrument of conveyance, not the sale consideration in the civil court decree. The relevant date for determining market value for stamp duty purposes is the date of execution of the sale deed by the court. Imposition of penalties under Section 47-A was deemed unauthorized in this case as there was no deliberate undervaluation to evade stamp duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 17:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 490 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273584</link>
      <description>The court held that stamp duty is chargeable based on the market value of the property conveyed by the instrument of conveyance, not the sale consideration in the civil court decree. The relevant date for determining market value for stamp duty purposes is the date of execution of the sale deed by the court. Imposition of penalties under Section 47-A was deemed unauthorized in this case as there was no deliberate undervaluation to evade stamp duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>