<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (6) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273582</link>
    <description>The plaintiff successfully obtained a declaration of title and recovery of possession of the lands in dispute, which were originally held under a fixed-term tenancy by his predecessor. The court affirmed the plaintiff&#039;s title and right to possession, rejecting the tenant&#039;s claim that the lands were settled with another party after the lease expired. The court upheld the validity of tenancy by holding over, emphasizing the landlords&#039; implied assent to continued possession. Additionally, the court confirmed the heritability and transferability of the tenancy, dismissing the appeal and directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 16:15:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (6) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273582</link>
      <description>The plaintiff successfully obtained a declaration of title and recovery of possession of the lands in dispute, which were originally held under a fixed-term tenancy by his predecessor. The court affirmed the plaintiff&#039;s title and right to possession, rejecting the tenant&#039;s claim that the lands were settled with another party after the lease expired. The court upheld the validity of tenancy by holding over, emphasizing the landlords&#039; implied assent to continued possession. Additionally, the court confirmed the heritability and transferability of the tenancy, dismissing the appeal and directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>