https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273582 Mere continuance in possession after expiry of a fixed-term lease is insufficient to create a tenancy by holding over; landlord's assent, express or implied, must be shown. Here, assent was inferred from long uninterrupted occupation, the landlords' knowledge, municipal records, absence of protest, and adverse inference from withheld papers, so the tenancy was renewed under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act as a month-to-month tenancy. Such a tenancy is not determined by the tenant's death and is capable of transmission and assignment, so the heirs' title was valid and the respondent derived title from them. en-us Wed, 01 Jun 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jul 2018 16:15:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273582 Mere continuance in possession after expiry of a fixed-term lease is insufficient to create a tenancy by holding over; landlord's assent, express or implied, must be shown. Here, assent was inferred from long uninterrupted occupation, the landlords' knowledge, municipal records, absence of protest, and adverse inference from withheld papers, so the tenancy was renewed under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act as a month-to-month tenancy. Such a tenancy is not determined by the tenant's death and is capable of transmission and assignment, so the heirs' title was valid and the respondent derived title from them. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Jun 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273582