https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273581 The court held that Section 110 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 does not apply to a monthly tenancy, and the notice to quit was deemed valid. The judgment emphasized that in a monthly tenancy, time is not limited by the lease but by the notice to quit. The court also ruled that the notice to quit, expiring with the month of February, was valid as it conformed to the requirement of expiring with the expiration of the period of the original tenancy. The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the validity of the notice to quit in the case. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 1943 00:00:00 +0630 Tue, 03 Jul 2018 16:01:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273581 The court held that Section 110 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 does not apply to a monthly tenancy, and the notice to quit was deemed valid. The judgment emphasized that in a monthly tenancy, time is not limited by the lease but by the notice to quit. The court also ruled that the notice to quit, expiring with the month of February, was valid as it conformed to the requirement of expiring with the expiration of the period of the original tenancy. The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the validity of the notice to quit in the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Mar 1943 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273581