https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273580 For a cinema licence under Rule 13 of the Madras Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1957, a non-owner must show lawful possession of the site, building and equipment; possession continuing after expiry of a lease, without statutory protection, is only juridical or wrongful possession and not lawful possession. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act protects against forcible dispossession but does not itself create lawful possession, and the tenant's duty to restore possession on termination of the lease remains relevant. Rule 13 was treated as governing both the original grant and renewal of a licence. In the absence of a manifest error of law in the licensing authority's interpretation, the High Court should not interfere under Article 226. en-us Wed, 31 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jul 2018 16:01:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273580 For a cinema licence under Rule 13 of the Madras Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1957, a non-owner must show lawful possession of the site, building and equipment; possession continuing after expiry of a lease, without statutory protection, is only juridical or wrongful possession and not lawful possession. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act protects against forcible dispossession but does not itself create lawful possession, and the tenant's duty to restore possession on termination of the lease remains relevant. Rule 13 was treated as governing both the original grant and renewal of a licence. In the absence of a manifest error of law in the licensing authority's interpretation, the High Court should not interfere under Article 226. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273580