https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273576 A lease clause that provides for continued possession until fair rent is settled on expiry creates only a contractual right of renewal, not an occupancy right, unless a pre-existing occupancy title is clearly proved. The text treats the ijara and kabuliyat as materially identical to an earlier clause previously construed by the Board, and on that construction they did not confer a new term of years or an occupancy interest. The appellants also failed to establish any antecedent occupancy right, and the earlier finding against occupancy right, though not res judicata, strongly supported the same conclusion. The result stated in the document is that the appellants could not resist khas possession on that basis. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 1920 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jul 2018 15:29:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273576 A lease clause that provides for continued possession until fair rent is settled on expiry creates only a contractual right of renewal, not an occupancy right, unless a pre-existing occupancy title is clearly proved. The text treats the ijara and kabuliyat as materially identical to an earlier clause previously construed by the Board, and on that construction they did not confer a new term of years or an occupancy interest. The appellants also failed to establish any antecedent occupancy right, and the earlier finding against occupancy right, though not res judicata, strongly supported the same conclusion. The result stated in the document is that the appellants could not resist khas possession on that basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Dec 1920 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273576