<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 125 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13543</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the ITAT&#039;s order of rectification under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, deeming it legally unsustainable. The court emphasized that rectification is limited to correcting apparent mistakes and cannot be used as an indirect review. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 125 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13543</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the ITAT&#039;s order of rectification under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, deeming it legally unsustainable. The court emphasized that rectification is limited to correcting apparent mistakes and cannot be used as an indirect review. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>