<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 81 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, reducing the redemption fine from &amp;amp;8377; 2,00,000 to &amp;amp;8377; 50,000 in a case involving the confiscation of excess mobile phones in an import consignment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proportionality in determining fines under the Customs Act, maintaining the personal penalty imposed while adjusting the redemption fine to align with the value of the confiscated goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 11:18:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 81 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, reducing the redemption fine from &amp;amp;8377; 2,00,000 to &amp;amp;8377; 50,000 in a case involving the confiscation of excess mobile phones in an import consignment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proportionality in determining fines under the Customs Act, maintaining the personal penalty imposed while adjusting the redemption fine to align with the value of the confiscated goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>