https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362771 The Tribunal confirmed the demand for service tax under Construction of Industrial or Commercial Complex service for the period after 1.6.2007, holding the appellant liable despite their argument that the main contractor should bear the responsibility. Penalties under section 78 were set aside due to the appellant's lack of awareness of the tax liability, while the demand and penalty under section 77 were upheld. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the order to only set aside the penalty under section 78. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jul 2018 11:17:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362771 The Tribunal confirmed the demand for service tax under Construction of Industrial or Commercial Complex service for the period after 1.6.2007, holding the appellant liable despite their argument that the main contractor should bear the responsibility. Penalties under section 78 were set aside due to the appellant's lack of awareness of the tax liability, while the demand and penalty under section 77 were upheld. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the order to only set aside the penalty under section 78. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362771