<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 69 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as it was based on an estimated GP rate without specific findings of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The penalty was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 07:23:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 69 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as it was based on an estimated GP rate without specific findings of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The penalty was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>