<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (12) TMI 71 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273564</link>
    <description>The court set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the accused, holding that the notification requirements had been substantially complied with, and there was no violation of Section 33 of the Indian Electricity Act. The petition was allowed, and any fine paid was ordered to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 17:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (12) TMI 71 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273564</link>
      <description>The court set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the accused, holding that the notification requirements had been substantially complied with, and there was no violation of Section 33 of the Indian Electricity Act. The petition was allowed, and any fine paid was ordered to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>