<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 155 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13537</link>
    <description>The High Court held that expenditure tax, luxury tax, and sales tax should not be included in total business receipts for deduction under section 80HHD, citing precedents excluding non-profit elements from turnover. The court also ruled that the refund of expenditure tax, granted in the subsequent assessment year, should not be considered as income for the current year, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision and dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 155 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13537</link>
      <description>The High Court held that expenditure tax, luxury tax, and sales tax should not be included in total business receipts for deduction under section 80HHD, citing precedents excluding non-profit elements from turnover. The court also ruled that the refund of expenditure tax, granted in the subsequent assessment year, should not be considered as income for the current year, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision and dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>