https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273563 The court upheld the conviction of the appellant, finding the evidence presented satisfactory and adequate for conviction. The court determined that the appellant's actions constituted an attempt to cheat under the Indian Penal Code, emphasizing the importance of intent and proximity to the intended cheating. The abetment charge was also upheld, and the legality of the sentence was not challenged. The court denied the appeal, affirming the broader interpretation of "attempt" under Indian law compared to English law. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 1893 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:33:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273563 The court upheld the conviction of the appellant, finding the evidence presented satisfactory and adequate for conviction. The court determined that the appellant's actions constituted an attempt to cheat under the Indian Penal Code, emphasizing the importance of intent and proximity to the intended cheating. The abetment charge was also upheld, and the legality of the sentence was not challenged. The court denied the appeal, affirming the broader interpretation of "attempt" under Indian law compared to English law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Feb 1893 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273563