<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1298 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273559</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed appeals where agricultural losses/profits claimed by the assessee were disallowed by the assessing officer but allowed by the CIT(A) and confirmed by the ITAT. The Tribunal found that the assessee carried out agricultural operations, and ownership of the land was not a requirement as long as agricultural activities were conducted. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1298 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273559</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed appeals where agricultural losses/profits claimed by the assessee were disallowed by the assessing officer but allowed by the CIT(A) and confirmed by the ITAT. The Tribunal found that the assessee carried out agricultural operations, and ownership of the land was not a requirement as long as agricultural activities were conducted. The appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>