<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1935 (4) TMI 18 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273558</link>
    <description>Mere preparation does not amount to attempt unless the accused performs an overt act sufficiently proximate to the offence. Here, the proved conduct showed only preliminary digging to remove earth and reach a stone slab; no actual act towards moving the slab was established. The court treated this as preparation rather than attempt, with the result that the conviction was set aside and the accused was acquitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 15:58:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1935 (4) TMI 18 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273558</link>
      <description>Mere preparation does not amount to attempt unless the accused performs an overt act sufficiently proximate to the offence. Here, the proved conduct showed only preliminary digging to remove earth and reach a stone slab; no actual act towards moving the slab was established. The court treated this as preparation rather than attempt, with the result that the conviction was set aside and the accused was acquitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>