https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273556 The court determined that the petitioner's actions did not amount to an attempt to commit an offense but were mere preparation. The judge highlighted the thin line between attempt and preparation, emphasizing the importance of intention, commencement of the commission, and acts towards the offense. Relying on legal precedents and considering the locus poenitentiae, the judge concluded that the petitioner's possession of opium while traveling did not constitute an attempt. The judge allowed the revision petition, setting aside the conviction and canceling the petitioner's bail bonds. en-us Fri, 01 Apr 1932 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 15:50:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273556 The court determined that the petitioner's actions did not amount to an attempt to commit an offense but were mere preparation. The judge highlighted the thin line between attempt and preparation, emphasizing the importance of intention, commencement of the commission, and acts towards the offense. Relying on legal precedents and considering the locus poenitentiae, the judge concluded that the petitioner's possession of opium while traveling did not constitute an attempt. The judge allowed the revision petition, setting aside the conviction and canceling the petitioner's bail bonds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Apr 1932 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273556