https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273552 Knowing circulation of an offending periodical can amount to publication for criminal liability where the accused received an advance copy, sought prior knowledge of its contents, and sold copies with awareness of the article's character; actual proof that buyers read it was unnecessary, so publication was established. Read as a whole and with surrounding circumstances, the article portrayed the Government as oppressive, approved violence as a response, and was intended to create hatred, contempt and disaffection; it was therefore seditious within Section 124A IPC. The revisional challenge failed, and the conviction and sentence were sustained. en-us Wed, 06 Oct 1909 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 15:39:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273552 Knowing circulation of an offending periodical can amount to publication for criminal liability where the accused received an advance copy, sought prior knowledge of its contents, and sold copies with awareness of the article's character; actual proof that buyers read it was unnecessary, so publication was established. Read as a whole and with surrounding circumstances, the article portrayed the Government as oppressive, approved violence as a response, and was intended to create hatred, contempt and disaffection; it was therefore seditious within Section 124A IPC. The revisional challenge failed, and the conviction and sentence were sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Oct 1909 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273552