<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (11) TMI 171 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273548</link>
    <description>The court upheld the extension of the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925, to Delhi in 1949, clarifying that the Central Government had the power to repeal the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912, in Delhi. The notification dated 8-1-1949 was deemed valid even though signed by a Deputy Secretary. However, the Registrar was found to lack jurisdiction in awarding costs and interest, leading to the quashing of that part of the award. Overall, the writ petition was mostly dismissed, with the exception of the costs and interest part being quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:05:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (11) TMI 171 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273548</link>
      <description>The court upheld the extension of the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925, to Delhi in 1949, clarifying that the Central Government had the power to repeal the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912, in Delhi. The notification dated 8-1-1949 was deemed valid even though signed by a Deputy Secretary. However, the Registrar was found to lack jurisdiction in awarding costs and interest, leading to the quashing of that part of the award. Overall, the writ petition was mostly dismissed, with the exception of the costs and interest part being quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>