https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273548 Section 7 of the Delhi Laws Act, 1912 was construed to permit extension of the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 to Delhi even though an earlier Delhi co-operative law already existed, and the local adaptation substituting Delhi for Bombay was treated as a valid adjustment rather than an impermissible executive repeal. The Court also treated authentication of the notification by a Deputy Secretary as sufficient and did not require inquiry into the Governor General's personal application of mind. On the reference issue, the Registrar had no jurisdiction to award costs and interest where the reference covered only the principal dispute, so that part of the award was quashed while the remainder was maintained. en-us Mon, 15 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 13:05:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273548 Section 7 of the Delhi Laws Act, 1912 was construed to permit extension of the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 to Delhi even though an earlier Delhi co-operative law already existed, and the local adaptation substituting Delhi for Bombay was treated as a valid adjustment rather than an impermissible executive repeal. The Court also treated authentication of the notification by a Deputy Secretary as sufficient and did not require inquiry into the Governor General's personal application of mind. On the reference issue, the Registrar had no jurisdiction to award costs and interest where the reference covered only the principal dispute, so that part of the award was quashed while the remainder was maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273548