https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273547 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable where the petitioner had already filed a statutory appeal against the same customs order and that appeal remained pending. The court treated the pending appellate remedy as a bar to parallel writ proceedings on the same grievance. It also held that no effective writ relief could issue against a named former Collector who had already ceased to hold office, especially where no successor or the Union of India was impleaded. The writ proceedings were therefore dismissed on technical grounds, and the dismissal was sustained. en-us Thu, 25 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 12:57:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273547 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable where the petitioner had already filed a statutory appeal against the same customs order and that appeal remained pending. The court treated the pending appellate remedy as a bar to parallel writ proceedings on the same grievance. It also held that no effective writ relief could issue against a named former Collector who had already ceased to hold office, especially where no successor or the Union of India was impleaded. The writ proceedings were therefore dismissed on technical grounds, and the dismissal was sustained. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 25 Nov 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273547