https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273544 The court held that the amended Section 21 applied retrospectively, entitling Smt. Harbheji to plead the amendment, treating Sukhram Singh and Laiq Singh as Asamis. The order of the Compensation Officer declaring them Adhivasis lacked finality due to procedural irregularities and ongoing proceedings under Section 202 of the Land Reforms Act. The appeal was dismissed, recognizing the appellants' loss of a valid plea due to the legislative amendment. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Sep 2022 18:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273544 The court held that the amended Section 21 applied retrospectively, entitling Smt. Harbheji to plead the amendment, treating Sukhram Singh and Laiq Singh as Asamis. The order of the Compensation Officer declaring them Adhivasis lacked finality due to procedural irregularities and ongoing proceedings under Section 202 of the Land Reforms Act. The appeal was dismissed, recognizing the appellants' loss of a valid plea due to the legislative amendment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273544