https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273543 Section 44A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was read broadly to permit the State Government, by notification, to authorise an officer subordinate to the Transport Commissioner to vary stage carriage permit conditions; administrative subordination was held sufficient on the notifications and materials before the Court, so the Regional Transport Officer had jurisdiction. Section 64A revisional power was confined to reviewing legality, regularity and propriety of subordinate orders and could not create original jurisdiction, but the revisional order was sustained because the variation was made by a competent delegated authority. The appeal therefore succeeded on the jurisdictional issue and the High Court's decision was set aside. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 12:10:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273543 Section 44A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was read broadly to permit the State Government, by notification, to authorise an officer subordinate to the Transport Commissioner to vary stage carriage permit conditions; administrative subordination was held sufficient on the notifications and materials before the Court, so the Regional Transport Officer had jurisdiction. Section 64A revisional power was confined to reviewing legality, regularity and propriety of subordinate orders and could not create original jurisdiction, but the revisional order was sustained because the variation was made by a competent delegated authority. The appeal therefore succeeded on the jurisdictional issue and the High Court's decision was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273543