https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273543 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the single Judge and Appellate Court of the High Court. The case was remanded to the High Court for rehearing on other points raised in the writ petition, as the initial decision was based solely on the jurisdiction issue. The appellant was awarded costs for the appeal, with costs in the High Court to abide by the result. Justice Subba Rao dissented, arguing that the Regional Transport Officer was not subordinate to the State Transport Commissioner within the meaning of Section 44A and would have dismissed the appeal. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 12:10:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273543 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the single Judge and Appellate Court of the High Court. The case was remanded to the High Court for rehearing on other points raised in the writ petition, as the initial decision was based solely on the jurisdiction issue. The appellant was awarded costs for the appeal, with costs in the High Court to abide by the result. Justice Subba Rao dissented, arguing that the Regional Transport Officer was not subordinate to the State Transport Commissioner within the meaning of Section 44A and would have dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273543