<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 44 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362736</link>
    <description>A statutory mine-restoration obligation arising from ongoing mining operations was treated as an ascertained liability deductible in principle because it had accrued and could be reasonably estimated, but the quantum required year-wise verification and was remanded. ROC fees for increase of authorised capital were treated as prima facie capital in nature, yet the alternative claim based on conversion of existing preference shares required factual examination and was sent back for fresh adjudication. CSR-related expenditure was allowed only to the extent it was supported and genuinely incurred for business purposes, while unsupported or non-business items were disallowed and the remaining items were remanded for verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 44 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362736</link>
      <description>A statutory mine-restoration obligation arising from ongoing mining operations was treated as an ascertained liability deductible in principle because it had accrued and could be reasonably estimated, but the quantum required year-wise verification and was remanded. ROC fees for increase of authorised capital were treated as prima facie capital in nature, yet the alternative claim based on conversion of existing preference shares required factual examination and was sent back for fresh adjudication. CSR-related expenditure was allowed only to the extent it was supported and genuinely incurred for business purposes, while unsupported or non-business items were disallowed and the remaining items were remanded for verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>