<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 37 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362729</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the trial court&#039;s judgment, confirming the conviction and sentences of the appellants for importing a luxury car in violation of customs regulations, conspiracy to cheat the Government of India, and fabrication of import documents. The court rejected the appellants&#039; arguments regarding immunity under the KVS Scheme and the admissibility of evidence collected by the DRI. The appellants were ordered to serve their remaining sentences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 11:03:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 37 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362729</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the trial court&#039;s judgment, confirming the conviction and sentences of the appellants for importing a luxury car in violation of customs regulations, conspiracy to cheat the Government of India, and fabrication of import documents. The court rejected the appellants&#039; arguments regarding immunity under the KVS Scheme and the admissibility of evidence collected by the DRI. The appellants were ordered to serve their remaining sentences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>