<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 25 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees in a case concerning turnkey contracts for the Rajasthan Government. It determined that the contracts should be classified as works contracts under the Works Contract Service (WCS) Composition Scheme from 01/06/2007. The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax before this date, granted penalty waiver under Section 80, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding compliance with Rule 3(3) of the WCS Composition Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 11:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 25 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees in a case concerning turnkey contracts for the Rajasthan Government. It determined that the contracts should be classified as works contracts under the Works Contract Service (WCS) Composition Scheme from 01/06/2007. The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax before this date, granted penalty waiver under Section 80, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding compliance with Rule 3(3) of the WCS Composition Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>