<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 22 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the lower authorities. It concluded that the Service Tax paid in error could be adjusted against the demand for the same period, based on the appellant&#039;s mistaken belief in availing the CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal emphasized the adjustment of the erroneously paid tax against the demand and penalty, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 06:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 22 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decision of the lower authorities. It concluded that the Service Tax paid in error could be adjusted against the demand for the same period, based on the appellant&#039;s mistaken belief in availing the CENVAT Credit. The Tribunal emphasized the adjustment of the erroneously paid tax against the demand and penalty, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>