<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 11 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362703</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for Central Excise duty and penalties, emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence in cases of clandestine removal. The decision was based on established legal principles and previous judgments, highlighting the importance of concrete evidence to support allegations of wrongdoing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 10:52:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 11 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362703</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for Central Excise duty and penalties, emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence in cases of clandestine removal. The decision was based on established legal principles and previous judgments, highlighting the importance of concrete evidence to support allegations of wrongdoing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>