https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362696 The appeal was dismissed as the lower authorities were bound by the Tribunal's directives regarding the refund claim, appropriation of funds, and unjust enrichment. The original authority's retention of a portion of the duty amount was upheld, as it pertained to inputs not eligible for refund. The appellant's challenge was rejected due to the specific scope of the remand order, limiting the authorities' discretion. The judgment emphasized adherence to the Tribunal's directives in resolving the issues raised. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 10:52:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362696 The appeal was dismissed as the lower authorities were bound by the Tribunal's directives regarding the refund claim, appropriation of funds, and unjust enrichment. The original authority's retention of a portion of the duty amount was upheld, as it pertained to inputs not eligible for refund. The appellant's challenge was rejected due to the specific scope of the remand order, limiting the authorities' discretion. The judgment emphasized adherence to the Tribunal's directives in resolving the issues raised. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362696