https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273539 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE confirmed the appropriation of the appellant's refund towards earlier demands, ruling that Section 35F did not apply, rendering the stay application unnecessary. The Tribunal also addressed the improper adjustment of the refund against pending demands and set aside the Final Order of the Commissioner, remanding the matter to the original adjudicating authority. The Tribunal directed the payment of the sanctioned refund to the appellant and instructed lower authorities to act within 2 months, ultimately disposing of the stay petition and appeal. en-us Thu, 04 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jul 2018 06:17:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273539 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE confirmed the appropriation of the appellant's refund towards earlier demands, ruling that Section 35F did not apply, rendering the stay application unnecessary. The Tribunal also addressed the improper adjustment of the refund against pending demands and set aside the Final Order of the Commissioner, remanding the matter to the original adjudicating authority. The Tribunal directed the payment of the sanctioned refund to the appellant and instructed lower authorities to act within 2 months, ultimately disposing of the stay petition and appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273539