<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1158 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, directing further examination of evidence for the deduction of &quot;fair market value&quot; of rights in the residential property and dismissing the claim for deduction under Section 54. The judgment emphasizes the significance of establishing the date and cost of acquisition for determining capital gains and allowable deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 09:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1158 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, directing further examination of evidence for the deduction of &quot;fair market value&quot; of rights in the residential property and dismissing the claim for deduction under Section 54. The judgment emphasizes the significance of establishing the date and cost of acquisition for determining capital gains and allowable deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>