https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273532 In second appeal, interference with concurrent findings of fact is confined to substantial questions of law; reappreciation of evidence to overturn findings on title and adverse possession, followed by a remand, is beyond jurisdiction. The factual record showed continuous, open and hostile possession by the plaintiff and his father for the requisite period, with municipal knowledge and no effective eviction steps, which was sufficient to establish title by adverse possession and prescription. The remand order and all proceedings based on it were therefore void, and the plaintiff's title should not have been disturbed. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:02:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273532 In second appeal, interference with concurrent findings of fact is confined to substantial questions of law; reappreciation of evidence to overturn findings on title and adverse possession, followed by a remand, is beyond jurisdiction. The factual record showed continuous, open and hostile possession by the plaintiff and his father for the requisite period, with municipal knowledge and no effective eviction steps, which was sufficient to establish title by adverse possession and prescription. The remand order and all proceedings based on it were therefore void, and the plaintiff's title should not have been disturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273532