https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273531 In reviewing an application under Rule 59 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949, the Central Government was required to consider the relevant record and any explanation from the State Government, and the process was treated as quasi-judicial because it affected rights. Fairness required disclosure of adverse material relied upon and a reasonable opportunity for the applicant to respond. A decision based on undisclosed material, without hearing the applicant, was inconsistent with natural justice and rendered the order invalid. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273531 In reviewing an application under Rule 59 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949, the Central Government was required to consider the relevant record and any explanation from the State Government, and the process was treated as quasi-judicial because it affected rights. Fairness required disclosure of adverse material relied upon and a reasonable opportunity for the applicant to respond. A decision based on undisclosed material, without hearing the applicant, was inconsistent with natural justice and rendered the order invalid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273531