<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (11) TMI 195 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273525</link>
    <description>The court found the application was within the limitation period, the contract valid, and disputes referable to arbitration. The agreement was ordered to be filed, and arbitration was directed, appointing Mr. M. S. Joshi as the sole arbitrator with a set fee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 12:58:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (11) TMI 195 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273525</link>
      <description>The court found the application was within the limitation period, the contract valid, and disputes referable to arbitration. The agreement was ordered to be filed, and arbitration was directed, appointing Mr. M. S. Joshi as the sole arbitrator with a set fee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>