https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273522 The court upheld the legality of the Magistrate's order passed without notice to parties, citing the limited role of the Magistrate under Section 146 of the Code. It affirmed the correctness of the civil court's finding on the relevant date for possession and validated the inclusion of a party not part of the preliminary order under Section 145. The court also deemed the absence of specific findings on possession of individual disputed plots as not fatal, emphasizing the overall possession determination. The Magistrate's order was upheld, and its operation stayed for two weeks, with a final stay until 4th October 1966. en-us Mon, 12 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jun 2018 12:14:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273522 The court upheld the legality of the Magistrate's order passed without notice to parties, citing the limited role of the Magistrate under Section 146 of the Code. It affirmed the correctness of the civil court's finding on the relevant date for possession and validated the inclusion of a party not part of the preliminary order under Section 145. The court also deemed the absence of specific findings on possession of individual disputed plots as not fatal, emphasizing the overall possession determination. The Magistrate's order was upheld, and its operation stayed for two weeks, with a final stay until 4th October 1966. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273522