<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (8) TMI 96 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273521</link>
    <description>The appellate order confirming excise duty assessment based on retail prices was challenged. The court held that the prices agreed with wholesale dealers did not constitute &quot;wholesale cash price&quot; under the Central Excises and Salt Act. Assessments for multiple years were revised, leading to higher tax liabilities. The court clarified that &quot;wholesale cash price&quot; should reflect factory sale prices, not post-manufacture expenses or third-party prices. The demand notices were deemed invalid as the agreed dealer prices constituted the &quot;wholesale cash price.&quot; The court set aside the assessments and demand notices, awarding costs to the petitioner company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:53:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (8) TMI 96 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273521</link>
      <description>The appellate order confirming excise duty assessment based on retail prices was challenged. The court held that the prices agreed with wholesale dealers did not constitute &quot;wholesale cash price&quot; under the Central Excises and Salt Act. Assessments for multiple years were revised, leading to higher tax liabilities. The court clarified that &quot;wholesale cash price&quot; should reflect factory sale prices, not post-manufacture expenses or third-party prices. The demand notices were deemed invalid as the agreed dealer prices constituted the &quot;wholesale cash price.&quot; The court set aside the assessments and demand notices, awarding costs to the petitioner company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>