https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273516 For third-party rights under pre-emption, a compulsorily registrable transfer became operative only when registration was completed, not on part payment, delivery of possession, presentation, or execution of the deed; the relevant sale date was therefore the date of completed registration. The plaintiff also failed to establish prompt performance of the talab, as the court rejected the account that knowledge of the sale arose only on the later date and treated the alleged demand as not genuine. Because promptness was not proved, the pre-emption claim failed. en-us Fri, 22 Feb 1935 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:03:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273516 For third-party rights under pre-emption, a compulsorily registrable transfer became operative only when registration was completed, not on part payment, delivery of possession, presentation, or execution of the deed; the relevant sale date was therefore the date of completed registration. The plaintiff also failed to establish prompt performance of the talab, as the court rejected the account that knowledge of the sale arose only on the later date and treated the alleged demand as not genuine. Because promptness was not proved, the pre-emption claim failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Feb 1935 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273516