https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273518 Title to tangible immovable property of the requisite value passes only by a registered sale deed; an earlier unregistered conveyance does not defeat the plaintiff's right to possession against a transferee. The suit for possession was therefore maintainable because no legally effective title had passed before registration. On limitation, the courts found that the plaintiff had no prior notice of the transfer and sued within three years from acquiring knowledge when possession was sought to be delivered, so the claim was within time. The decree for possession with mesne profits was upheld and the appeal failed. en-us Mon, 09 Aug 1920 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:03:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273518 Title to tangible immovable property of the requisite value passes only by a registered sale deed; an earlier unregistered conveyance does not defeat the plaintiff's right to possession against a transferee. The suit for possession was therefore maintainable because no legally effective title had passed before registration. On limitation, the courts found that the plaintiff had no prior notice of the transfer and sued within three years from acquiring knowledge when possession was sought to be delivered, so the claim was within time. The decree for possession with mesne profits was upheld and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Aug 1920 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273518