<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1924 (10) TMI 1 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273520</link>
    <description>A gift of immovable property remains incomplete until the registered instrument comes into existence under the statutory scheme; execution, attestation and delivery of the deed alone do not complete the transfer. Reading Sections 122, 123 and 126 of the Transfer of Property Act with the Registration Act, the donor retains a locus poenitentiae and may revoke the gift before actual registration. Registration may proceed without the donor&#039;s consent for the purpose of completing registration, but it does not extinguish a prior revocation. The analogy of sale and mortgage was rejected, and English deed principles were held not to control the Indian statutory framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 1924 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:03:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1924 (10) TMI 1 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273520</link>
      <description>A gift of immovable property remains incomplete until the registered instrument comes into existence under the statutory scheme; execution, attestation and delivery of the deed alone do not complete the transfer. Reading Sections 122, 123 and 126 of the Transfer of Property Act with the Registration Act, the donor retains a locus poenitentiae and may revoke the gift before actual registration. Registration may proceed without the donor&#039;s consent for the purpose of completing registration, but it does not extinguish a prior revocation. The analogy of sale and mortgage was rejected, and English deed principles were held not to control the Indian statutory framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 1924 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>