<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1519 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362692</link>
    <description>The CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that they cannot be taxed under the category of &quot;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency&#039;s Service&quot; for deputing technical staff to joint venture companies. The impugned order imposing service tax liability and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on legal precedents and reasoning. The decision was made in open court, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1519 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362692</link>
      <description>The CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that they cannot be taxed under the category of &quot;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency&#039;s Service&quot; for deputing technical staff to joint venture companies. The impugned order imposing service tax liability and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on legal precedents and reasoning. The decision was made in open court, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>