<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1488 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362661</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the abatement claimed under Notification No. 1/2006-ST by a respondent in commercial construction services was dismissed. Despite receiving free supply material, the abatement benefit was upheld based on the decision of the Larger Bench in the Bhayana Builders case. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s validation of the Larger Bench&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the importance of legal precedents and the binding nature of higher court decisions on lower tribunals. This case highlights the significance of legal interpretations and the impact of higher court rulings on lower tribunal decisions in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:58:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1488 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362661</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the abatement claimed under Notification No. 1/2006-ST by a respondent in commercial construction services was dismissed. Despite receiving free supply material, the abatement benefit was upheld based on the decision of the Larger Bench in the Bhayana Builders case. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s validation of the Larger Bench&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the importance of legal precedents and the binding nature of higher court decisions on lower tribunals. This case highlights the significance of legal interpretations and the impact of higher court rulings on lower tribunal decisions in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>