<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1674 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273502</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the rejection of Order-in-Original No. 84/2011 related to services under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; was dismissed by the Tribunal. It was found that the incentives received by the assessee were not connected to the services provided under Business Auxiliary Service. The impugned order was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was deemed lacking in merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:03:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1674 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273502</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the rejection of Order-in-Original No. 84/2011 related to services under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; was dismissed by the Tribunal. It was found that the incentives received by the assessee were not connected to the services provided under Business Auxiliary Service. The impugned order was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was deemed lacking in merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>