<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1576 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal held that the input services for which CENVAT credit was denied were eligible based on established judicial interpretations and precedents, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 07:03:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1576 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal held that the input services for which CENVAT credit was denied were eligible based on established judicial interpretations and precedents, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>