<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1232 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a Government of India undertaking, in a case concerning Service Tax liability under &#039;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency&#039;s Service&#039;. The Tribunal found that the deputation of technical staff to joint venture companies did not attract Service Tax liability based on previous decisions and the terms of the joint venture agreement. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the order imposing tax liability and penalty, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 06:47:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1232 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a Government of India undertaking, in a case concerning Service Tax liability under &#039;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency&#039;s Service&#039;. The Tribunal found that the deputation of technical staff to joint venture companies did not attract Service Tax liability based on previous decisions and the terms of the joint venture agreement. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the order imposing tax liability and penalty, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>