<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1183 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273495</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restore the registration of the assessee, emphasizing that the cancellation based on Section 10(23C)(vi) was not sufficient grounds under Section 12A. The Court also clarified that the assessee could claim exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) without fulfilling Section 11 conditions, and since the Commissioner&#039;s order did not mention Section 11 conditions, the restoration of registration was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:20:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1183 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273495</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restore the registration of the assessee, emphasizing that the cancellation based on Section 10(23C)(vi) was not sufficient grounds under Section 12A. The Court also clarified that the assessee could claim exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) without fulfilling Section 11 conditions, and since the Commissioner&#039;s order did not mention Section 11 conditions, the restoration of registration was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>