<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 101 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13513</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the balance in the suspense account collected by the assessee from the sale of arrack constituted a trading receipt and was part of the sale price. The Court emphasized that the nature of the receipt as sale proceeds of arrack was pivotal, regardless of accounting treatment. The assessee could claim deductions in subsequent years when refunds were issued to customers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 101 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13513</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the balance in the suspense account collected by the assessee from the sale of arrack constituted a trading receipt and was part of the sale price. The Court emphasized that the nature of the receipt as sale proceeds of arrack was pivotal, regardless of accounting treatment. The assessee could claim deductions in subsequent years when refunds were issued to customers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>