<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1673 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273485</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court considered whether the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 and the 1981 Rules governing pay scales apply to minority and non-minority unaided schools, and held that they do. It also held that the 2016 amended Rules were enforceable from their publication in the Official Gazette, the legislative laying requirement being directory rather than mandatory. The court further held that writ petitions seeking enforcement of statutory pay scales in Schedule C were maintainable, and that the doctrine of contracting out could not defeat the teachers&#039; claim absent voluntary waiver. The petitioners were therefore entitled to revised pay fixation and related monetary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:53:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=525185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1673 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273485</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court considered whether the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 and the 1981 Rules governing pay scales apply to minority and non-minority unaided schools, and held that they do. It also held that the 2016 amended Rules were enforceable from their publication in the Official Gazette, the legislative laying requirement being directory rather than mandatory. The court further held that writ petitions seeking enforcement of statutory pay scales in Schedule C were maintainable, and that the doctrine of contracting out could not defeat the teachers&#039; claim absent voluntary waiver. The petitioners were therefore entitled to revised pay fixation and related monetary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>