<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 122 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13509</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and affirming the eligibility of the entire building for higher depreciation as a hotel under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Rules and Appendix I. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to consider the entire building, including structures used for non-hotel purposes, as part of the hotel business was upheld, leading to the allowance of 20% depreciation for the entire building.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:34:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 122 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13509</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and affirming the eligibility of the entire building for higher depreciation as a hotel under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Rules and Appendix I. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to consider the entire building, including structures used for non-hotel purposes, as part of the hotel business was upheld, leading to the allowance of 20% depreciation for the entire building.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>