<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 121 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13507</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, confirming the penalty imposed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld as justified, given the evidence of concealed income. The court found no substantial question of law, emphasizing the necessity for genuine reasons and proper establishment of concealed income in penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2024 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 121 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13507</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, confirming the penalty imposed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld as justified, given the evidence of concealed income. The court found no substantial question of law, emphasizing the necessity for genuine reasons and proper establishment of concealed income in penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>